User talk:67.169.75.174

January 2021
Hello, I'm Binksternet. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to United States anti-abortion movement seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 18:26, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to United States anti-abortion movement. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 19:22, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at United States anti-abortion movement shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Binksternet (talk) 19:28, 28 January 2021 (UTC)


 * The issue was decided in May–June 2018 at the following discussion: Talk:United_States_anti-abortion_movement/Archive_8. The terms "pro-life" and "pro-choice" were deemed non-neutral, and we determined to use "anti-abortion" and "abortion rights" wherever possible. Binksternet (talk) 20:01, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

Important Notice
Doug Weller talk 19:28, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

Important Notice
Doug Weller talk 19:29, 28 January 2021 (UTC)