User talk:67.190.125.169

Characters lists
Hey, first of all weclome to Wikipedia! I have to note here, though, that this was the fourth time I reverted you, therefore, please refrain from edit warring further. Such character lists, in what ever form, should not be included in an article per our guidelines at WP:GAMEGUIDE, except if single chracters in the game are independently notable (such as protagonists, antagonists), which is not the case for "simply every playable character". Furthermore, your very last edit was rather disruptive than anything else. I stated in my edit summaries that you should please contact me via my talk, but you did not take up that offer. If you have any further questions, just reply here. Lordtobi ( &#9993; ) 16:57, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Addition: Being "like a yo-yo" by purposefully edit warring with other editors will likely catch you a few disruptive editing notice and an edit block in the end, and I think we both don't want this to happen. Lordtobi  ( &#9993; ) 16:59, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
 * StrandD: I'll stop with the "threatening" as you say. I have a feeling that Rocket, Groot, and Spider-Man 2099 are all main protagonists of the game because Spidey was in the middle of the game cover which I think they like to do with main protagonists, and Rocket and Groot showed up a lot in the trailer and have the most dialogue so I guess they are main protagonists, too. I am new to Wikipedia, and I didn't know about this. Edit warring was my only option at the time. So, is this officially a discussion now? And I wasn't playing stupid. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.190.125.169 (talk) 15:29, 13 June 2017
 * First of all, two quick things for discussions: When adding a comment, please indent it using n colons  (where n is the index of yor message), so it appears ordered. Secondly, at the end of your message, append four tildes , which provides your signature and a timestamp. Regarding edit warring, is should never the "only option", either be bold in the first (or sometimes second) edit, or, if it fails, discuss. Always discuss. The only point edit warring can be used is when fighting vandalism. Users that are not blocked yet tend to stress that by pursuing further and further just to disrupt editors. And, yes, this is a discussion. Furthermore: The wide array of Lego games out there often tend to not have a firm protagonist, as up to ten are playable in each level, and they switch between various levels. Adding a list of characters one considers protagnosts, you would effectively limit the already presented GAMEGUIDE to a shorter, personalized version (which would be original research). As already explained above, if singular characters receive independent notability covered in reliable, secondary sources, they shall be included and explained. "independent notability", however, is not being part of a list in a reliable source, which currently applies to all characters (especially since the game is not out yet). Any further questions? P.S. Saw your latest addition to your comment, I'm sorry if I got this wrong, but I had multiple such cases where trolls (usually sockpuppets/sockpuppeteers) would just say "I don't know how to discuss HELP!" in the edit summary and replace every second word of an article with "penis". Mature, right?  Lordtobi  ( &#9993; ) 15:50, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Yeah, real mature :P. Sorry if I looked like a "troll" to you. I just want to try to improve this page. Do you think that it would be OK to say the people who pre-order the game would get an exclusive Giant-Man minifigure, or would that sound too much like an advertisement? If so, maybe we could just say he's crucial to the story? I found that out from an official website that Im afraid to say because it might censor this whole message. You tell me.67.190.125.169 (talk) 19:24, 13 June 2017 (UTC)StrandD
 * Do you have a reliable, secondary source (IGN, RPS, GameSpot, Eurogamer, etc.) for this claim? If this is specifically denoted, he stands out from the rest, but should be covered in his respective context (of being a pre-order exclusive). I can as well help you with creating the citation around the source, if it is not yet present in the article (there are a lot). Lordtobi  ( &#9993; ) 19:28, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
 * I can check. Come back in a little bit. StrandD67.190.125.169 (talk) 20:37, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Found it. TheBrickFan.com says: the exclusive Giant-Man Minifigure will be included... although he is called Giant-Man, he has the look of Hank Pym's Goliath. The first source was Marvel.com, and had an interview with Aurthur Parsons. StrandD67.190.125.169 (talk) 20:48, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
 * I don't feel like "The Brick Fan" is a reliable source, nor is it secondary. From the title alone we can assume that this is a fanpage, classified on Wikipedia as a tertiary source; unsable here, sorry. Lordtobi  ( &#9993; ) 20:50, 13 June 2017 (UTC)


 * It's OK. But I did see a picture of Goliath. Let me look on IGN, and RPS. StrandD67.190.125.169 (talk) 21:37, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Found nothing else on Giant-Man. But on IGN, I found out the name of the hub. It's Chronopolis. Will that be acceptable? P.S. Do you think "Across space and time" is better than "through space and time"? StrandD67.190.125.169 (talk) 21:37, 13 June 2017 (UTC)


 * I'm afraid that, if this is the case, we cannot cover Giant-Man at this moment (in emergency cases we could add the fact and tag with "citation missing", but that would not be preferable to anyone). About Chronopolis: Sources are there, just pick one out of this list, and add it to the article (the link encapsulated by (to properize the citation, adding author, date, website, etc., I can help you later). Lordtobi  ( &#9993; ) 06:14, 14 June 2017 (UTC)