User talk:67.193.58.115

The Arbiter  Ѫ★Ѫ  00:54, 21 October 2009 (UTC)

May 2009
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary. Dl2000 (talk) 23:50, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

You're removing sourced information.
Hi. Please, don't remove sourced information, Wikipedia don't works this way. If you disagree with something sourced in the article, please, use the discussion page. Bye. (JoaquimMetalhead (talk) 03:50, 5 November 2009 (UTC))

June 2010
Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Thousand Foot Krutch, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Walter Görlitz (talk) 01:04, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Thousand Foot Krutch. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 19:27, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.


 * Look, you've had three users tell you that the text shouldn't be added. You're not providing a source for any of it, and Wikipedia is not considered a reliable source. Discuss your edits on the talk page. You've already passed the threshold for reversions (3RR - see above) so you could be facing a block after this. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 19:47, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

Two quick issues.
 * 1) There's no question that one song from TFK has made it into a Rock Band expansion pack. It's one of the reasons I'm considering getting Rock Band (that and Skillet, P.O.D., and a few other Christian Rock bands). That's not the issue that needs a citation. It's that the Fire It Up is the band's most commercially successful song. "Move" charted higher on the US Main charts and "Rawkfist" charter higher overall. Regardless, suggesting it is what Wikipedia calls Original Research. If you have an article from a reliable source that states it's the band's most commercially successful song just cite it. In this case, even the band's blog, Facebook page, Twitter page, or YouTube channel is a reliable source. The real problem is that Wikipedia doesn't care about what's right or not but what's verifiable. I know. It sucks.
 * 2) Your activities are starting to garner attention from other, mainstream editors. That sort of activity could get you blocked. I understand what you're doing and want to help improve the article but know that the additions you've made recently won't stand another editor's scrutiny. Feel free to talk about it on the article's talk page or on mine. You've got some good ideas and I'd like to have then incorporated in Wikipedia. We just have to go about it the right way. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 19:53, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

Thousand Foot Krutch
Hi, there's been a complaint about your editing of the above. If you make another inappropriate edit or revert, you're likely to be blocked without further warning. Please discuss your concerns on the article's talk page. Many thanks, SlimVirgin  talk  contribs 20:01, 2 June 2010 (UTC) You have been blocked from editing for a short time for your disruption caused by edit warring and violation of the three-revert rule. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Slim, I imposed this block before seeing your message. If you have other measures you want to take instead or work something out, feel free to take whatever action you feel is appropriate. --B (talk) 21:23, 2 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Hi B, thanks, I'm fine with the block. I was in two minds about it myself. SlimVirgin  talk  contribs 22:27, 2 June 2010 (UTC)