User talk:67.197.233.24

Welcome!
Hello, 67.197.233.24, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!

Relativistic wave equations
Sorry to delete that section but it hardly derives anything, and dwells on four-vectors too much. See talk:Relativistic wave equations. 'M'&and;Ŝc2ħεИτlk 15:01, 29 May 2016 (UTC)


 * No worries, but could you place some info about the construction of RWE's on the page. I think it would be appropriate and informative. The reason I had put emphasis on 4-vectors is that most of the RWE's have an explicit 4-vector in them.
 * Thanks, John Wilson


 * I apologize if I seemed pessimistic. The history section in the article does mention how to get to the KG equation by taking the energy-momentum relation and forming the operator equivalent, and Dirac equation by "factorization" or the "square root" of the KG equation which introduces the alpha and beta matrices. The articles on the KG and Dirac equations also have these details. The relativistic e-p relation is the starting point (and its form can be obtained in the framework of SR). Your route of obtaining the equation was not wrong, but for the RWE article it diverted to four vectors and their invariants, a topic which has its own article and is to be assumed for any RQM article. At some point the article should have a Lorentz group representation section which allows the construction of RWEs for particles of any spin.
 * I noticed you wrote an identical section in four gradient, which I will not delete, but maybe it could be trimmed/rewritten a little to be more on topic.
 * Anyway, welcome again and hope you enjoy editing. Why not create an account? We could do with more maths/physics editors. 'M'&and;Ŝc2ħεИτlk 18:16, 29 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Ok, I have created user account SciRealm. I will continue working on the 4-gradient article. SciRealm (talk) 22:47, 29 May 2016 (UTC)