User talk:67.218.90.4

September 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Torrey Mitchell, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. HJ Mitchell &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   01:32, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

November 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Chestnut Teal has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Alansohn (talk) 03:35, 18 November 2010 (UTC)

December 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Terabyte, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Terabyte was changed by 67.218.90.4 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.983324 on 2010-12-05T01:19:05+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 01:19, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Prophets of Islam. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Prophets of Islam was changed by 67.218.90.4 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.969281 on 2010-12-05T01:20:17+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 01:20, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at New York Rangers, you will be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: New York Rangers was changed by 67.218.90.4 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.950291 on 2010-12-05T01:26:35+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 01:26, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

January 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Trail of Tears, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Trail of Tears was changed by 67.218.90.4 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.954888 on 2011-01-11T17:01:37+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:01, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Trail of Tears constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you.  Wikipelli  Talk   17:02, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

Please do not add unsourced content, as you did to Blow (song). This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. - (CK)Lakeshade  -  talk2me  - 22:23, 31 January 2011 (UTC)

February 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Afro-Mexican, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Zachlipton (talk) 18:34, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Afro-Mexican, you may be blocked from editing. Zachlipton (talk) 18:36, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

This is your last warning; the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Afro-Mexican, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. --Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 23:11, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

March 2011
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Adam Lamberg, you may be blocked from editing. Glenn L (talk) 02:20, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Yale University with this edit, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you.  Chzz  ► 23:04, 27 March 2011 (UTC)

This is your last warning; the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Eurythmy, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Thank you! -- Orphan Wiki 19:51, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

April 2012
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Nambaryn Enkhbayar. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nambaryn_Enkhbayar&action=history page history]. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. 70.248.189.190 (talk) 22:48, 13 April 2012 (UTC)

May 2012
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Buenos Aires, you may be blocked from editing. Alexf(talk) 15:08, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

Awake (TV series)
This is good information that you added provided you can provide a source. If you need help just insert a link in the article and someone can format it properly.— Vchimpanzee ·  talk  ·  contributions  · 15:33, 26 May 2012 (UTC)

June 2012
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding or significantly changing content without citing a reliable source is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Jim1138 (talk) 01:15, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

December 2012
Hello, I'm Sfgiants1995. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to The Five People You Meet in Heaven, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Sfgiants1995 (talk) 01:22, 5 December 2012 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at From Day 1. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. TheOriginalSoni (talk) 19:28, 11 December 2012 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Flag of Brazil, you may be blocked from editing. -- Wywin (talk &#124; contribs) 15:00, 12 December 2012 (UTC)

February 2013
Hello, I'm Andrewman327. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Elizabeth Hamilton, Countess of Orkney because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Andrew327 03:25, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

April 2013
Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Preliminary Discourse to the Encyclopedia of Diderot, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. BDD (talk) 23:19, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Critical point (thermodynamics), you may be blocked from editing. BigPimpinBrah (talk) 16:40, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Webclient101. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Hindu–Islamic relations, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Webclient101 talk 15:49, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Christian Science, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Shearonink (talk) 19:13, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Carol Channing, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Shearonink (talk) 19:15, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

September 2013
Hello, I'm Petrb. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Industrial agriculture, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Petrb (talk) 15:07, 27 September 2013 (UTC)

November 2013
Hello, I'm Petrb. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to White Revolution, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Petrb (talk) 14:39, 21 November 2013 (UTC)

February 2014
Hello, I'm Mark Arsten. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to John Abisch, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:17, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at John Abisch with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:23, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Slazenger. I noticed that you recently removed all content from John Abisch, with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, I restored the page's content. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. --Slazenger  (Contact Me) 20:22, 18 February 2014 (UTC)

July 2014
Hello, I'm K6ka. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Abstract (summary) because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. --k6ka (talk &#124; contribs) 16:40, 10 July 2014 (UTC)

October 2014
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at JaVale McGee. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Rikster2 (talk) 00:47, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

November 2014
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Gestapo with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Skamecrazy123 (talk) 14:37, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

December 2014
Hello, I'm KylieTastic. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Hot chocolate— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. KylieTastic (talk) 19:04, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

September 2015
Hello, I'm Bentogoa. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to French and Indian War— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Bentogoa (talk) 15:49, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at French and Indian War with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. (t) Josve05a  (c) 15:50, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to French and Indian War with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. (t) Josve05a  (c) 15:50, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Stamp Act 1765. Deli nk (talk) 16:06, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

To edit, please create an account and log in  [ Last edited]: Last edited by: (UTC)

Due to persistent vandalism, anonymous editing from your school, library, or educational institution's IP address blocked (disabled). You will continue to have access to read the encyclopedia. If you are logged in but still unable to edit, please follow these instructions. To prevent abuse, account creation via this IP address might also be disabled.

If account creation is disabled and you are unable to create an account elsewhere, you can request one by [//accounts.wmflabs.org/ filling out this form]. Please check on [ this list] that the username you choose has not already been taken. If editing is required for class projects, please have your instructor or network administrator contact us (with reference to this IP address) at the [//utrs.wmflabs.org/ Unblock Ticket Request System] with a contact email address that is listed on your school's website. Thank you for your cooperation.

October 2016
Hello, I'm 2601:188:1:AEA0:5026:9BD2:9F02:C2DF. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. 2601:188:1:AEA0:5026:9BD2:9F02:C2DF (talk) 00:58, 5 October 2016 (UTC)

September 2017
Hello, I'm Flyer22 Reborn. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Self-Reliance have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 01:11, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2019
This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Taft School, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Kinu t</i>/<i style="color:red">c</i> 02:24, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Taft School, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. - Arjayay (talk) 16:56, 6 November 2019 (UTC)

January 2023
Hello, I'm SunDawn. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Ed Elton, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. &maltese; SunDawn &maltese;    (contact)   03:44, 5 January 2023 (UTC)

Please refrain from making test edits to Wikipedia pages, such as the one you made with this edit to Ziti, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Lemonaka (talk) 23:28, 9 January 2023 (UTC)

February 2023
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Dhahran School ‎, you may be blocked from editing. <b style="color:black">Felida</b><sup style="color:black">97 (talk) 23:41, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

February 2023
Please stop making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted. If you add your edit again, be sure to leave an edit comment explaining why you are making the changes, or post a message on the article's talk page. signed, Willondon (talk) 23:42, 6 February 2023 (UTC)

<div class="user-block" style="padding: 5px; margin-bottom: 0.5em; border: 1px solid #a9a9a9; background-color: #ffefd5; min-height: 40px"> Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month to prevent further vandalism. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Bbb23 (talk) 23:51, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Unblock Account
{{unblock reviewed|Hi Wikipedia, today I registered for an editing user; however, while I was away from my computer someone (namesake) had used my comments to make unrelated edits that are considered disruptive. When I returned I informed the individual to cease doing so, and these edits do not in any way correlate with the communal IP address, 67.218.90.4, the Hotchkiss School. These events will not happen in the future. Apologies for the anomaly, and I sincerely hope that you could help restore the editing access for the IP address so that everybody else may edit. With sincere appreciation!} 67.218.90.4 (talk) 01:54, 7 February 2023 (UTC)|decline="Someone else did it" doesn't really work as an unblock request. If that worked, everyone would use it. Also, it doesn't really matter who made the disruptive edits on an IP address. On shared IP addresses, the IP address is typically blocked because someone made disruptive edits, not because a specific person made disruptive edits. And, finally, it's probably best we keep this IP address blocked for a little while given the disruption from logged-in accounts, too. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:29, 7 February 2023 (UTC)}}


 * is closed. I told them to request unblocking on their talk page. Will fix this one. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 02:03, 7 February 2023 (UTC)


 * Noting AN report for thoroughness.-- Deepfriedokra (talk) 02:07, 7 February 2023 (UTC)


 * IP, if you remove/modify a declined block request again, I will revoke Talk page access.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:04, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
 * I've lengthened this and marked it as a schoolblock to coincide with the previous 6 years of blockage. --jpgordon&#x1d122;&#x1d106;&#x1D110;&#x1d107; 16:17, 7 February 2023 (UTC)