User talk:67.22.244.93

Please refrain from removing content from Wikipedia, as you did to Shock site. It is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Mango juice talk 19:22, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

Please do not add commercial links (or links to your own private websites) to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or a mere collection of external links. You are, however, encouraged to add content instead of links to the encyclopedia. See the welcome page to learn more. Thanks. Mango juice talk 20:01, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you insert a spam link, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Yamla 02:47, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

Your edit history shows you clearly knew you were adding a shock site to the article on Brad Pitt. You have been blocked for a week. If you continue trying to deliberately damage the Wikipedia, we can block you permanently. --Yamla 02:49, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to use Wikipedia for advertising, you will be blocked from editing. Mango juice talk 04:27, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

I have repeatedly, and politely, asked you to discuss your desire to add porkhole.net to the Shock Site article on the talk page, Talk:Shock site. In order to include Porkhole we want to see some evidence that this is a shock site anyone pays any notice to, and that evidence has to come from reliable sources, not merely random forum postings or blog entries. This is a tough standard for any web site, admittedly, but Wikipedia is not the same kind of thing as ; here, we need outside verification of our information. I wouldn't have called your edits spam except for your extreme insistence on re-adding porkhole without discussion or comment: to my mind, the only explanation I could come up with is that you are trying to promote the porkhole site.

As for Meatspin, it's not in a much better position than Porkhole, other than that the discussion has led to us decidely not including Porkhole. Meatspin should probably go because there's no verification for it; people were actively looking, though, and its Alexa rank and google hits show it's quite prominent for this kind of site. Meatspin, for instance, gets over 600 unique google hits, while Porkhole only gets about 150, of which many don't refer to the site (which is not true for Meatspin).

Please, again, stop adding porkhole. This is called edit warring, and it's very unproductive. You need to discuss the situation on the talk page. Mango juice talk 20:39, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

Please stop adding porkhole without discussion. Go to Talk:Shock site if you want to discuss. Mango juice talk 23:52, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

I'm asking you for a third time to please stop adding porkhole to Shock site without discussion. Go to Talk:Shock site if you want to discuss. Mango juice talk 23:52, 18 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Thanks for going to the talk page, finally. I moved your comment to the bottom and replaced what you wrote over.  Hopefully others will respond beyond just me; keep looking at Talk:Shock site for the next few days.  Mango juice talk 19:00, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

Welcome
Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

I'm leaving this message so you have a good list of pages to read so you can start to understand better how Wikipedia works. I saw you had some difficulty getting on the talk page before.

Again, welcome! Mango juice talk 19:00, 19 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Hey -- the link you left on my talk page about porkhole doesn't point to a review of the site. Are you thinking of Foolish Child's comment on the talk page?  Because if so, that doesn't back you up: s/he still says you need a reliable source.  Was there a different link you were trying to show me? Mango juice talk 23:50, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Read Reliable sources for a basic background on what we mean by reliability. In order for a source to be reliable, we at least have to know who the info is coming from.  So, the links you showed me on my talk page are not reliable.  We're looking for a newspaper article, or at least an e-zine or reputable blog here.  Forums, myspace, livejournal, all that stuff is too easy to fake.  But if you disagree about the reliability of those sources, I encourage you to take it to Talk:Shock site; it's not my article, I'm just one of the people watching it.  Mango juice talk 04:21, 28 June 2006 (UTC)