User talk:67.221.93.194/sandbox

“When looking at correlations in the data, education seems to generate economic growth; however, it could be that we have this causality relationship backwards. For example, if education is seen as a luxury good, it may be that richer households are seeking out educational attainment as a symbol of status, rather than the relationship of education leading to wealth.”

This quote is in the Wikipedia page I read, Education Economics. Which is stating a possibility of something happening, but there is no citation at all to back up the claim that the relationship could be backwards. It is a great idea but the writer is contradicting popular belief without using any resources.

I think that it was set up in a good way in which has a good flow to it. The table of contents was set up well. For the most part the page had a lot of different viewpoints, but I think that it could’ve focused more on the different view points. For example it had Marxist critique of the theory, but yet they don’t have other people’s opinions either praising or talking negatively about the topic. For the most part this page seems to be well put together, it is cited well. It does not have any major glaring errors. But I only had a quick look over at it so there was a chance I missed an error or two. This is why I was unable to find the definite answer if every single source in the wikipage was credible and worked. But each source that I did check went to a link that worked and seemed legit to me. Going back to what I mentioned before, I also think that they should’ve added sources from different perspectives or opinions. This is due to the fact that without adding different thoughts on the matter they are saying that the only facts they acknowledge are ones supporting this idea. It is illegitimating the other ways of thought.