User talk:67.23.151.159

Welcome
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Someone using this IP address,, removed content from the page Yugo without giving an explanation. Please always provide an informative edit summary when removing content from pages. If is a shared IP address and you did not do this, you may wish to consider [ getting a username] to avoid confusion with other editors and further irrelevant notices.

Here are a few good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Tips on starting your first article
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Here are some other hints and tips:
 * I recommend that you get a username. You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but  [ creating an account]  is quick, free and non-intrusive, requires no personal information, and there are many benefits of having a username. (If you edit without a username, your IP address is used to identify you instead.)
 * When using talk pages, please sign your name at the end of your messages by typing four tildes . This will automatically produce your username (or IP address) and the date.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or type  here on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Helpthepeople9 (talk) 15:26, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

November 2020
Hello, I'm Yahya. I noticed that in this edit to Yugo, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ~Yahya ( ✉ ) • 19:45, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

Edmonton Elks
Hi, I'm here to talk about your recent edit to the Elks page

Saying things like "Considered by some" goes against our MOS:WEASEL. Please in future if needed bring up sources to show if something is debated, use specific examples rather than adding generalizations.

Thank you! MatthewNewHouse (talk) 21:58, 4 February 2023 (UTC)


 * I put those words in because to not have them makes the statement sound like it is fact. It is not fact. 67.23.151.159 (talk) 16:33, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
 * We have the sources there to say it is. If a term is offensive, it's not up for debate if it is or not. We have multiple sources linked to that sentence specifically to show that it's not debated.
 * It is fact.
 * If you have reliable source WP:RS that say it is not, then you are free to add them. But please remember that even if only a portion of people are offended by something, that still means it is offensive. Adding "Some find," as said previously, goes against MOS:WEASEL.
 * Please remember that other people do find it offensive. Perhaps go through the sources given. MatthewNewHouse (talk) 22:51, 4 March 2023 (UTC)