User talk:67.239.64.250

April 2023
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ascension of Jesus. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. tgeorgescu (talk) 23:12, 28 April 2023 (UTC)


 * I gave a rationale for the edit and I don't see how this constitutes vandalism. The original text from the article does not help the overall construction of the article; in particular, it presents as fact a claim that Luke's Gospel states that the resurrection and the ascension happened on the same day, which is not true. I understand the rationale behind neutrality in Wikipedia articles, but it would be equally biased to present as fact something which is not manifestly evident to neutral observers than it would be for a Christian to present the ascension as something which is historically held to have happened. Keeping the original text up is a kind of sectarianism in the other direction, I hope that's not what you want, so for the sake of preventing disinformation and having overall articles of good quality which are legitimately informative, I ask that you allow the edit to remain. If you revert them again, I would kindly request that you give a reason for why they should stay rather than saying that the edit is unconstructive, because at that point it will be clear that this has nothing to do with presenting objective information and everything to do with fighting on one side of a religious war. 67.239.64.253 (talk) 01:14, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Ascension of Jesus shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. tgeorgescu (talk) 01:46, 29 April 2023 (UTC)