User talk:67.243.96.250

Question
Hi @Gatemansgc, I found some more false accusations of vandalism on certain pages in Wikipedia made against me by ItsCheck. Could you look into these reverts and maybe reverse some of his reverts of my edits? The pages that I've seen this so far is at the pages Supermax prison and Federal Correctional Complex, Terre Haute. Please let me know. Thank you for your assistance. 67.243.96.250 (talk) 01:24, 28 July 2023 (UTC)


 * Why you delete our old conversation?


 * I reverted one of them with a long edit summary. Don't get why the person has such issue with you instead of looking for actual vandalism to revert like I do... (also, I was at work when you pinged me, and I am not logged into Wikipedia on my phone so I don't see stuff like this until I get ready to do some vandalism fighting) Gatemansgc (TɅ̊LK) 06:16, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Hi @Gatemansgc, I deleted our old conversation since our old issues were resolved. Thank you for reverting the edit for Supermax prison. Could I go ahead and revert back to my old edit of Federal Correctional Complex, Terre Haute? Please let me know. Thank you for your assistance. 67.243.96.250 (talk) 15:02, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Makes sense, though to anyone considering dropping a template on this IP's page please check the page history and read the old conversation before doing so!


 * And yeah you should, just leave an edit summary detailing why the changes are accurate and remember to stay calm. I may have to go trout them if they keep targeting you. Gatemansgc (TɅ̊LK) 18:26, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Hey @Gatemansgc
 * The edits I reverted that @67.243.96.250 is talking about got detected by my anti vandalism filter for the recent edits page. Because @67.243.96.250 does not have an account, I didn't know it was them because of the similarity with other IPs. I already promised I won't revert any edits by @67.243.96.250, so that's my explanation for my edits. ItsCheck (talk) 19:41, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
 * I don't want this to happen again, so if there is any way to avoid this, please tell me what I need to do.
 * ItsCheck (talk) 19:43, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
 * @ItsCheck There will be many edits that your RC will pick up that aren't vandalism but are highlighted for "may have problems" (changing wikilinks tends to be picked up by this often). Because these edits are listed for human review by RC patrollers and not automatically reverted the threshold is much lower so there's a TON of false positives. No matter how much you want to get your edit count up and beat the other people to reverting stuff, look over each edit. You'll get better and faster at it over time. Gatemansgc (TɅ̊LK) 20:28, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
 * @Gatemansgc,
 * I DO look over my edits, and I appreciate you reminding me. I won't just revert stuff because I want edits, and I have never done so before either. ItsCheck (talk) 02:05, 29 July 2023 (UTC)

Reverted edits
Hi @Gatemansgc,

It seems like ItsCheck has reverted my edits without due cause. The edits I'm referring to is in the Wikipedia page Federal Correctional Complex, Yazoo City. My edits aren't vandalism and were just made to reflect the accuracy of the information. Please review. Thank you for your assistance. 67.243.96.250 (talk) 02:33, 29 July 2023 (UTC)


 * Hey @67.243.96.250,
 * I already explained my mistake in the above section. I swear I won't revert anything again. ItsCheck (talk) 02:59, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Hi @ItsCheck,
 * I will give you one opportunity to due the right thing. How about you reverse your revert of my edits since there is no due cause. Maybe you could start with Federal Correctional Complex, Yazoo City. I hope I don't need to get @Gatemansgc or any other admin involved into this issue. Thank you for taking the time to listen. 67.243.96.250 (talk) 21:07, 29 July 2023 (UTC)