User talk:67.248.183.123

September 2021
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Lord & Taylor, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. ''Leave it alone please. It is up to you to take this to the article's talk page if you disagree with the undo. Don't continue to restore your version. We don't use external URLs that way, we don't capitalize every word that way, and we don't use unencyclopedic and crystal ball language such as "Closed Forever". Per WP:BRD. See WP:MOS'' Meters (talk) 21:23, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Its fate was "bankruptcy and liquidation" . That's all we need, and that's how we say it. Meters (talk) 21:25, 5 September 2021 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Lord & Taylor. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges on that page. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges.

''Just leave it alone. Edit warring to add WP:Crystalball and WP:MOS violating language is not a good idea'' Meters (talk) 20:21, 7 September 2021 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Lord & Taylor. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. ''Please stop messing with it. Join the discussion on the talk page if you like.'' Meters (talk) 22:45, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at High Delta Safari Park, you may be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: High Delta Safari Park was changed by 67.248.183.123 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.946442 on 2021-09-14T00:15:33+00:00 Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:15, 14 September 2021 (UTC)