User talk:67.249.248.128

September 2023
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Credit risk—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 01:38, 25 September 2023 (UTC)


 * Hello!
 * While it's probably not a hill I'd be willing to make a last stand on 😅, I would at least like to explain why I made the alteration:
 * Original : "Credit risk is the possibility of losing a lender holds due to a risk of default on a debt"
 * My Edit : "Credit risk is the possibility of losing that a lender holds due to a risk of default on a debt"
 * I added the conjunction "that" because the current syntax can potentially make the sentence appear confusing at first glance: "the possibility of losing a lender holds" almost looks like "lender holds" is some esoteric financial term in and of itself, a thing that can be lost. And considering some of the odder terms that show up in finance...
 * ... I figured adding "that" would reduce syntactic ambiguity.
 * So, I'm asking you to reconsider your reversion, but if it were to remain as is, it's probably not something that would keep me up at night ;) 67.249.248.128 (talk) 15:38, 27 September 2023 (UTC)