User talk:67.42.180.219

Taking it to your talk page
You're also mocking him by sarcastically calling him "poor" and "oppressed" while asking if you're hurting his feelings in that same tone. That is not mature. You don't always have to like one another on this site but you also should not be an ass towards the same person. I suggest you stop being your IP gets blocked. This is a warning and I really hope that you abide to it and maybe even decide to work and edit on Wikipedia in the future. We're still looking for new volunteers here. GamerPro64 21:34, 16 October 2015 (UTC)


 * That's laughable. I tried editing and I was completely civil at the time. I was incorrectly accused of being a sockpuppet and banned without any evidence being presented. In fact, when I tried to appeal it the admins mocked my appeals and didn't address my arguments. So when I'm told I need to play nice and wikipedia wants new editors I know it is completely bullshit. If wikipedia really wanted new editors they wouldn't falsely accuse and ban people for shit they aren't guilty of. We all know the truth, you will get banned for "wrongthink." Nothing on wikipedia really has to do with policy.

Hell, I'll even show you my account if you want. Why would I bother making another one when it would just get banned without justification? 67.42.180.219 (talk) 21:41, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

October 2015
Hello, I'm MelbourneStar. I noticed that you made a comment on the page User talk:GamerPro64 with this edit that didn't seem very civil, so I removed it. Wikipedia needs people like you and me to collaborate, so it’s one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. —MelbourneStar ☆ talk 07:42, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.


 * It wasn't uncivil. I was pointing it out to him because I thought he might be interested. He knows exactly what I'm talking about. Blatant censorship from political ideologues on this website.

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at User talk:GamerPro64. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. ''The content of that message was uncivil towards the editors who remove the content you're adding. I'm not agreeing nor disagreeing with the removal - but labelling them "fascist" will not be tollerated.'' —MelbourneStar ☆ talk 07:46, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on User talk:GamerPro64. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Continue attacking other editors, and I'll take this to WP:ANI. —Mel<b style="color:#F20">bourne</b><b style="color:#F73">Star</b> ☆ <sup style="color:#407">talk 07:49, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make personal attacks on other people. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. —<b style="color:#E22">Mel</b><b style="color:#F20">bourne</b><b style="color:#F73">Star</b> ☆ <sup style="color:#407">talk 07:50, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for attempting to harass other users. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice:.  bibliomaniac 1  5  07:59, 21 October 2015 (UTC)