User talk:67.60.91.71

December 2022
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Allied logistics in the Southern France campaign. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. [I'm puzzled that you believe my edits to be unconstructive. My edits were intended to slightly improve an excellent article. I don't understand how my edits could be regarded as vandalism, since they did not change the factual content of the article. One edit [", per weapon"] involved a minor clarification. The sentence stated how much ammunition ["five units of fire"] was brought ashore by the landing troops. A few sentences later the "units of fire" is explained as differing per type of ammunition. This implies that "five units of fire" means five times the numbers given, per weapon. When I was first reading the article I was puzzled by the phrase "five units of fire" until I came across the later sentences. If you don't feel that ",per weapon" is a useful addition, so be it. But I don't think it should be regarded as vandalism. . . If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. If you are not an expert on the subject you should not be editing the article. . . Two of my edits were slight grammatical corrections. Is a military expert required to correct English grammar?

Hawkeye7  (discuss)  01:45, 9 December 2022 (UTC)