User talk:67.61.119.92

Welcome!
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions&#32;so far. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

Here are some links to pages you may find useful:
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but if you wish to acquire additional privileges, you can simply  [ create a named account] . It's free, requires no personal information, and lets you:
 * Create new pages and rename pages
 * Edit semi-protected pages
 * Upload images
 * Have your own watchlist, which shows when articles you are interested in have changed

If you edit without using a named account, your IP address (67.61.119.92) is used to identify you instead.

I hope that you, as a Wikipedian, decide to continue contributing to our project: an encyclopedia of human knowledge that anyone can edit. If you need help, check out Questions, or you can  to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. We also have an intuitive guide on editing if you're interested. By the way, please make sure to sign and date your talk page comments with four tildes (&#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;).

Happy editing! Geoff &#124; Who, me? 19:06, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

New Mexican cuisine
You seem to be the same person who was editing New Mexican cuisine in January, 2018, which I've assumed by the nature of your edits to the article currently. Below is a copy of the messages two of us sent to the Talk page of the other IP user, inviting discussion on suggested edits on the article talk page. Even if I have made an incorrect assumption, please join us there to further discuss ideas for improving the article. Geoff &#124; Who, me? 19:11, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

Hello - you've been adding a great deal of other wise fine material to the New Mexican cuisine article. The only problem with your additions is that many (or most) of them seem to be based on original research or personal knowledge, rather than on independently verifiable sources. Wikipedia discourages original research, preferring instead to have facts supported by citations to reliable sources. Please see these articles for more in the policies: WP:OR, WP:RS and WP:V. Please join those of us interested in the subject and in improving the article on its talk page to further discuss improvements, especially in adding reliable sources. Cheers! Geoff &#124; Who, me? 15:32, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Please also see WP:Writing better articles, WP:Neutral point of view, and WP:What Wikipedia is not. The level of attention you're bringing to the topic (and presumably others) is welcome, and I'm sure you'll become a fine encyclopedist, but it requires shifting far away from the editorial style one might use on a blog or forum. Too much of what you've been trying to add is emotive opinion and peacock wording, not objective fact (e.g., Wikipedia should never describe anything, ever, as "exquisite"). A related problem is the frequency with which you're writing in unprovable absolutes like "always", "never", etc., and veering between a "how to" style and an op-ed one, neither of which are permissible here.  Encyclopedic writing is dry and simple, providing an overview of basic facts; it is not persuasive, advocating, instructional, hypothesizing, or dwelling on minutiae.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  22:49, 26 January 2018 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at New Mexican cuisine, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  01:26, 28 January 2018 (UTC)