User talk:67.79.68.21

July 2021
Hello, I'm Zudo. Your recent edit(s) to the page Austin, Texas appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been reverted for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page.   Zudo (talk) 14:42, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Austin, Texas. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.   Zudo (talk) 14:45, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Austin, Texas, you may be blocked from editing. Racoony RE  Message meContributions 14:47, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours to prevent further vandalism, as done at Austin, Texas. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. --   LuK3      (Talk)   00:22, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bedrock (investment firm) (April 30)
 Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Bedrock_(investment_firm) Articles for creation help desk] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by CNMall41 was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: There seems to be a misunderstanding about the requirements despite the notes left by previous reviewers. We will not keep reviewing drafts just because they are submitted. You need to review the notes and make corrections. You were told that references need to meet WP:ORGCRIT but instead of pointing out or adding those, you removed references. I am unsure how to assist at this point.

CNMall41 (talk) 03:15, 30 April 2024 (UTC)