User talk:67.85.219.228

I agree that I should be banned because I did vandalize pages but I do not agree with you about banning me messing up and blanking my own talk page. I would be fine with my ip address edit block being removed or shortened to a week, 1 1 month, a day or longer. P.S I promise I won't intentionally mess up any articles ever again after this ip address edit block is removed or shortened. P.S. Is my ability to create accounts permantely disabled even after the ip address block ends or temporalily disabled until the ip address block ends67.85.219.228 (talk) 00:19, 3 June 2020 (UTC)67.85.219.228

==

Notice
Just so you know, removing notices is considered proof you have read the notice. Randompointofview (talk) 02:38, 4 June 2020 (UTC)

 Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/autoblock/?user=&project=en.wikipedia.org autoblocks] • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ creation log] • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]) )

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.