User talk:67.87.191.26

September 2018
This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on others again, as you did at Comedy, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. ''Don't make remarks like you did. '' Drmies (talk) 00:12, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.


 * Thank you for correcting this. Drmies (talk) 00:13, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
 * I have corrected the style of that awkward "corrected" sentence.--67.87.191.26 (talk) 01:44, 13 September 2018 (UTC)

Drmies, I believe you have harmed the Comedy article by undoing my new section titled "Molière - the creator of modern French comedy" under the pretext that "[s]ection is unverified and unwarranted" (Moliere is more important than Shakespeare in modern comedy and thus warranted, and I compiled the section from verified pieces of Moliere), and then you have used excessive and easy to abuse means, by issuing the above warning, to demonstrate authority in apparent support of your subjective and one-sided said undoing in violation of WP:REVEXP. Shame on you, you can do better than that. You do not have to discourage educated people from editing WP.--67.87.191.26 (talk) 01:35, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
 * The moment you make bullshit comments like "who are you and what do you know", I don't have to deal with you as a good-faith editor anymore. "Do you have any literary education?" Yes, I have a PhD and twenty years of teaching it at university. You, on the other hand, change things that are correct and make them wrong. Much of the rest you say indicates you don't rightly know how Wikipedia works, re: sourcing, for instance. Shall I? You copied text from the Moliere article, but Wikipedia is not a source for Wikipedia. You say M is more important than S to comedy--well, that's what you say (original research), but the text you added says nothing that's to the point of comedy, and that's why it was "unwarranted" context. So nothing here is "subjective" one way or another: I warned you for a personal attack, and I reverted your content because it was, indeed, unverified and unwarranted. You want Moliere in? That's fine with me--write it up properly for the comedy article. Drmies (talk) 01:43, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Firstly Drmies, so you have issued the very serious, excessive, and easy to abuse, warning in anger, since you still steaming with it. Anger is a really bad adviser for action, as it causes impulsivity clouding the mind and thus you should remove your "angry" warning.  Secondly, Moliere is so important for comedy that I was shocked by his absence and fast compiled the section to inspire others to look at it and... correct where needed, hence obviously in good faith, as something is better than nothing, and articles are available for... improvement.  Moliere wrote "the greatest ambition of women is to inspire love".  I recommend it to you too.  Take care.--67.87.191.26 (talk) 02:18, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Oh how sweet of you. Drmies (talk) 02:21, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Drmies, now the readers of Comedy have nothing on Moliere. So, what is a benefit of your actions in the matter?  Who benefited the article: I poorly (according to you) constructing the section or you undoing it and leaving the article with nothing?  Who acts in good faith: those who create something constructive or those who undo it?  Nice dreams.--67.87.191.26 (talk) 04:35, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
 * And you were wrong claiming that "copied text from the Moliere article, but Wikipedia is not a source for Wikipedia", as copying pieces is practiced all over WP with a reference to the main article under the title, and though the reference was missing, you could have included it while acting in good faith, but you chose not to. Copied pieces are implicitly verified, as originating from verified articles. So, you were wrong on that account as well and... no remorse, no regret that readers of Comedy have nothing on Moliere - the father of modern comedy (not only French).--67.87.191.26 (talk) 04:48, 13 September 2018 (UTC)