User talk:67.87.191.87

Welcome
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Someone using this IP address, 67.87.191.87, made test edits on the page Aripiprazole which have been reverted or removed. If you did this, please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. If 67.87.191.87 is a shared IP address and you did not do this, you may wish to consider [ getting a username] to avoid confusion with other editors and further irrelevant notices.

Here are a few good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Tips on starting your first article
 * Help pages • Tips
 * Tutorial

Here are some other hints and tips:
 * I recommend that you get a username. You do not have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but  [ creating an account]  is quick, free and non-intrusive, requires no personal information, and there are many benefits of having a username. (If you edit without a username, your IP address is used to identify you instead.)
 * When using talk pages, please sign your name at the end of your messages by typing four tildes ( ~ ). This will automatically produce your username (or IP address) and the date.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or type  here on  talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Spyder212 (talk) 20:34, 25 March 2019 (UTC)


 * the formal logic error as to the scope of the elderly corrected this time... properly. Thank you for pointing out my sloppiness.--67.87.191.87 (talk) 21:19, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Wonderfully corrected! Cheers, Spyder212 (talk) 22:51, 25 March 2019 (UTC)

Refs
You will need to add these. Best Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) 17:05, 5 April 2019 (UTC)


 * , I hope you will not vandalize my par. added to aripiprazole's lead for the 3rd time, as then I will take the matter to arbitration. Sincerely, --67.87.191.87 (talk) 14:28, 5 May 2019 (UTC).
 * Certainly.
 * Or you could just get consensus on the talk page. Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) 22:20, 5 May 2019 (UTC)
 * , or you could get consensus through editing - the primary method of achieving consensus as per WP:CONACHIEVE. Please, let me know, if you are able to do so.  I would really appreciate that.  Your apparent invitation to the discussion is made by the moot statement, as analyzed under it, and needs some merit to be substantial.  Otherwise, my invitation to consensus through editing stands, as the editing is in progress.  Also, the issue of refs is secondary to the content, as aripiprazole has already fully referenced section on the pharmacodynamics, which v. condensed summary was constituted by the par. I added to the lead and you removed 3 times without any reason supported by WP's policies.  Please, justify everything you write.  E.g., when you remove a primary reference, please, stipulate which one was it, so it can be verified whether or not you are right, etc. Sincerely, --67.87.191.87 (talk) 04:44, 6 May 2019 (UTC)