User talk:68.114.130.234

Welcome to Wikipedia
allen四names 19:02, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

December 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Crucifixion in art has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Alan (talk) 23:56, 11 December 2009 (UTC)

Talkback
Alan (talk) 00:25, 12 December 2009 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for attempting to harass other users. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. tedder (talk) 18:22, 12 December 2009 (UTC)

In the unblock request, the user claims that there was only a single incident. Setting aside the fact that blocks are given for single incidents of egregious personal attacks, the claim is factually untrue and misleading. User is a single-purpose account that boasts of coming here from an external site that seeks to create drama here, has deleted page material , and has repeatedly directed incivility at multiple users , , , , ,. --Tryptofish (talk) 20:05, 12 December 2009 (UTC)

You are Wiki-Lawyering, and frankly if anybody is doing the harassing here, it's you. You have repeatedly minimized my arguments by claiming that I am Sockpuppeting, Meatpuppeting, and making personal attacks when I am attacking the material of the article and its source. 'You are passive aggressive' is not an egregious personal attack, and 'you didn't read what I wrote and you are being deliberately obtuse' isn't a personal attack at all. (Seriously, How is "You're deliberately not reading what I wrote" possibly offensive to anybody?) I didn't come here to create drama, I didn't claim that I did. I claimed that a particular website made me aware of something on wikipedia that I thought was wrongly included in an article. I've made legitimate criticisms, and my comments are directly responsible for the creation of the Crucifixion in Art page. I argued civilly enough and generated enough consensus among the majority of wiki users to remove the offending material from the original Crucifixion page and have it moved to a new page. When I got around to looking at that new page I found that it had not been cleaned up and contained questionable claims from an unreliable tertiary source, so I made an argument on the discussion page and removed the offending material. Because I didn't make an edit summary, I found my revision rather rudely reverted by a member of one of your user:groups. I reacted and Alan pointed out my mistake: a simple oversight by a novice user, one that might have been cleared up when I read Alan's talk page had you not immediately jumped in and made baseless claims against me. -- 68.114.130.234 (talk) 20:38, 12 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Block shortened to 24h with consent of blocking admin. I don't feel it met "egregious personal attack" at all, but there is a tension level here that everyone involved would do well to calm down. --Golbez (talk) 22:03, 12 December 2009 (UTC)