User talk:68.133.30.229

November 2022
Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/National awakening of Romania. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. —Brigade Piron (talk) 21:19, 8 November 2022 (UTC)


 * You mention the word "attack". I am confused. I am new to this and Wikipedia rules seem to be rather complicated. Would you be willing to clarify Wikipedia guidelines and tell me which words or phrases that I used represent an attack ?
 * From my point of view I am just a messenger warning you of the potential consequences of sentences like "My objection is that "National awakening of Romania" doesn't seem to be a clearly defined topic." which seems to offend an entire nation with millions of people.
 * I felt a lot of rage and I anticipate that an entire nation will feel the same. Is it wrong to express my feelings and warn you about the potential consequences ?
 * Do you think the message about the potential consequences of making such offensive statements is itself an attack ?
 * Would you be more comfortable if I would not give you a warning and perhaps let things develop ?
 * And speaking about content, the sentence "My objection is that "National awakening of Romania" doesn't seem to be a clearly defined topic." is not talking about content either.
 * It is in fact an attack on an entire nation with million of people.
 * The content of that article might not be coherent or might have other issues, but the concept of "National awakening of Romania" exists regardless of the Wikipedia content.
 * Saying that the concept does not exist is not talking about content but an attack on an entire nation.
 * What are you going to do about the "other editors" attacking an entire nation, and not talking about content ? 68.133.30.229 (talk) 19:17, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
 * I feel like something is missing in Wikipedia organization. People who do not know about other nations history or concepts should refrain of making suggestions or bringing arguments for concepts they are not familiar with or assume the consequences and be responsible for their statements.
 * I thought this would be common sense. And yet this common sense is lacking in Wikipedia editors. Just because they worked on other articles does not give them the right to work or making decisions in topics they are not familiar with.
 * Before even working on an article called "National awakening of Romania" ask yourself what do I know about that topic ? Did I take enough and provable lessons of Romania's history ? If I am making an argument that can lead to a big decision, would I be able to defend my actions ?
 * Why the need to defend ? Because Wikipedia editors' actions have a big impact. And I expect Wikipedia editors to be responsible.
 * (well this is assuming that those actions are not intentionally evil) 68.133.30.229 (talk) 19:50, 13 November 2022 (UTC)


 * Hi IP, thanks for your reply. I would recommend reading Assume good faith. Whether you think it is reasonable to act in this way or not, I would warn you that you are likely to get blocked if you express yourself in this way here in future. A good place to start if you want to contribute would be to visit the Teahouse. —Brigade Piron (talk) 22:15, 13 November 2022 (UTC)


 * Could you please clarify "likely to get blocked". What is going to get blocked ? My access to Wikipedia ?
 * My ability to comment under an account name or under an IP (to specific articles or to all Wikipedia content?)? 68.133.30.229 (talk) 00:37, 14 November 2022 (UTC)