User talk:68.150.205.250

Sourcing
I'm not a fan of the partisan hackery that can be the National Post editorial team, but they are considered reliable by the Wikipedia community at large (as it has not been placed on Wikipedia's WP:DEPRECATED list, nor is it seen as de facto by WP:CANADA's editors). You will need to make a case in the article's talk page about why that specific citation would be considered incorrect/unreliable, as simply making the assertion that the notion that the National Post is unreliable is something that is baseless in the Wiki community (ie. that is, it is not on the depreciated list).

In saying that, if you would like to initiate a discussion to move the NP on a depreciated list, you are free to do so. But until such a discussion has occurred and a consensus on it has been reached, you cannot just make an assertion that a journalistic source is "unreliable" and not expand on why said item should be removed. If you have an issue with the specific citation, bring it up on the talk page so you don't get into an edit war.

Post: Also looking at it again, the second time you removed it, the editor added a source from GG.ca, which is literally from the government. Leventio (talk) 20:05, 15 May 2023 (UTC)