User talk:68.150.64.128

141 (number)
I hadn't caught on that you meant to type "odd", hence my revert. I can see that you managed to type it right, and thus I won't revert that one. Liliana UwU (talk / contribs) 06:12, 19 November 2022 (UTC)


 * Thank you for the good-faith edits but I think LilianaUwU was right to revert in this case. 141 isn't the odd natural number following 140, because 140 isn't an odd natural number (in the same way that 141 isn't the natural number following 140½, because 140½ isn't a natural number).  We don't normally mention properties such as being odd in the lead.  I see that you've made many helpful edits elsewhere, and I hope you will continue your useful contributions to Wikipedia.  Thanks again, Certes (talk) 11:28, 19 November 2022 (UTC)

Emirp
Could you add links ( i.e. emirp )to the entries where you are adding "an emirp" on some number pages? I added a few of them, but you made a lot of changes.. thanks. Dhrm77 (talk) 23:32, 4 December 2022 (UTC)

December 2022
Hello, I'm LilianaUwU. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to 20 (number)—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Liliana UwU (talk / contribs) 03:10, 18 December 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at 20 (number), you may be blocked from editing. Drmies (talk) 03:13, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.


 * Even if it were correct it would be trivial, but it is not correct: "20 is the first number to contain the letter Y". No. "20" consists of a 2 and a 0. Drmies (talk) 03:14, 18 December 2022 (UTC)

Hi 68.150.64.128! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of 243 (number) several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree&#32;at, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. ''Some editors clearly feel that properties such as Harshad numbers are too common to merit a mention in number articles. If you disagree, please seek consensus for their addition on a talk page or at a forum such as WikiProject Numbers. Do not just add the content repeatedly after being reverted.''. Certes (talk) 20:28, 31 December 2022 (UTC)

Edits to number articles
Hello 68.150.64.128. I support your edits and additions, for the most part. However, you need to provide proper links and references to your additions. I know it can be a hassle, however it's a standard here for good measure. It let's people see where the information came from, and permits editors to also monitor the quality of information entered. For other guidelines to adding quality information to various number articles, please see WikiProject Numbers and Notability (numbers), as these are good starting guidelines. Thank you for your contributions, and Happy New Year! Radlrb (talk) 08:27, 2 January 2023 (UTC)


 * I agree, and this seems like a case where communication is required. An edit justified in an edit summary, talk page discussion or other communication is much more likely to be retained, or at least improved by consensus into a form everyone can support. Certes (talk) 14:38, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

February 2024
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to WWF Royal Rumble (1993 video game)—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 00:42, 8 February 2024 (UTC)

Notification: Blocked
 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for Vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding  below. Materialscientist (talk) 00:42, 8 February 2024 (UTC)

April 2024
Hello, I'm Classicwiki. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Cold-stimulus headache have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Classicwiki (talk) If you reply here, please ping me. 22:20, 3 April 2024 (UTC)