User talk:68.198.251.147

March 2020
Hello, I'm Thepenguin9. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to 1988 United States presidential election in Michigan—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks.  Thepenguin9 (talk''') 04:24, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at 1988 United States presidential election in Michigan. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges.

No-one said it was a debate, only you  Thepenguin9 (talk''') 04:59, 19 March 2020 (UTC)

It seems to me this is what it’s becoming unfortunately. The section I removed is clearly biased and is an attempt to sway the reader to think one way. It truly does not even belong on this article. On a Wikipedia article on Reaganomics it would make more sense. Reaganomics is only relevant on this page to the extent that it actually impacted the election. The debate on how it potentially impacted the Great Recession has nothing to do with the 1988 election in Michigan.