User talk:68.200.166.252

January 2022
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Busch Gardens, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Mosrod Talk 21:31, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

February 2022
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Lana Turner, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. SunDawn talk  14:17, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

March 2022
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to The Picture of Dorian Gray (1945 film), did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. —  B203GTB    (talk)  • 15:41, 1 March 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Keith Moon. - FlightTime  ( open channel ) 00:16, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Bsoyka. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Hawaii Five-O (1968 TV series)—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Bsoyka ( talk ) 16:15, 21 March 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add defamatory content to Wikipedia, as you did at Hawaii Five-O (1968 TV series). Dove&#39;s talk (talk) 21:21, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you add defamatory content to Wikipedia again, as you did at Hawaii Five-O (1968 TV series), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Dove&#39;s talk (talk) 21:26, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:.  Spencer T• C 22:23, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

April 2022
Hello, I'm Wretchskull. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Wretchskull (talk) 13:18, 1 April 2022 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Sam Cooke. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Changing the wording from few to dozen does not do anything. 0xDEADBEEF (T C) 13:53, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

May 2022
Hello, I'm Padgriffin. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Key Largo (film)—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Padgriffin Griffin's Nest 11:22, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Chicago VI. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Pulpfiction621 (talk) 17:38, 31 May 2022 (UTC)

July 2022
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Ed White (astronaut), it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Mako001 (C) (T)  🇺🇦 10:58, 3 July 2022 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at List of Walt Disney Animation Studios short films, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Waxworker (talk) 14:01, 9 July 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to J. Harold Smith, you may be blocked from editing. -Alabama- (talk) 20:58, 15 July 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at The Devil's Rain (film). Mr.weedle (talk) 13:21, 17 July 2022 (UTC)

August 2022
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Red Rocks Amphitheatre, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Pennstatephil (talk) 06:14, 18 August 2022 (UTC)

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Wikipelli Talk  23:30, 18 August 2022 (UTC)

Please do not add unsourced or original content. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 16:38, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

September 2022
Hello, I'm TheEpTic. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Where no man has gone before—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. TheEpTic (talk) 12:07, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

Hello. Your recent edit to Horror host appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. Toddst1 (talk) 23:22, 9 September 2022 (UTC)

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Smothers Brothers. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. FrederalBacon (talk) 23:22, 9 September 2022 (UTC)

Please do not add unsourced or original content. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. FrederalBacon (talk) 23:22, 9 September 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Barnaby Jones. Woodlot (talk) 12:08, 21 September 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Who Mourns for Adonais?. Woodlot (talk) 12:19, 21 September 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Psycho II (film). BenBrownBoy (Aye?) 19:27, 21 September 2022 (UTC)

 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Alexf(talk) 20:08, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.