User talk:68.224.117.152


 * The ArbCom members have been informed of this message on their respective talk pages. Please do not re-add the tag. ArbCom will contact you. -- omtay  38  02:17, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Okay, thanks. --68.224.117.152 (talk) 02:30, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

Can an arbitrator please respond to this: I have sent the following E-mail to the Arbitration Committee and they have not responded, see the date the mail was sent. The arbitrators either: do not read emails, refused to read mine, or have not got it yet. Now I will WP:AGF that they have not received my email, so I will post it here:

I am User:Ionas68224, and known on IRC as Ionas_Freeman. I have had a terrible history here, one that I won't go into great detail about. If you don't know, you can review http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Ionas68224 or http://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Ionas68224 for the history. I would like to appeal my block, or what Ryulong and someone named "Ryanpostlethwait" on IRC (presumably User:Ryan_Postlethwaite) call a ban (even though I am not on LOBU and only they have called it a ban).

I was previously a dick (after I was a vandal), and quite mean, not assuming good faith with vandals and basically unsympathetic as User:bibliotheque on English Wikipedia and kind of chatty on the Simple English Wikipedia. I then felt that I should change my en.wp name to match my simple.wp name, Ionas68224. And so I did. Then, I had made a comment saying on Ryulong (someone who I'd never met since then)'s RFC saying that he should be desysopped for his meanness, and people ganged up on me saying I had only been there 30 days, then saying that it was trolling, and even went so far to go that I was a terrible criminal for being on a B.A.D.S.I.T.E. wikipediareview, and for supporting Daniel Brandt.

So, now I realise that Daniel is quite a mean person, using the law to intimidate people like Phaedriel after finding his old Wikipedia Review posts outing on WR that a certain editor was transsexual, revealing the real identity of Katefan0, and Phaedriel. Accuising one of our nicest Wikipedians of being a felon when I think he was actually doing something to "harass and annoy" Phaedriel, and I have concluded that since his threats never really turn into real lawsuits, he does it to feel proud of hisself.

So anyway, I want to contribute constructively under a new account. I will go under a conditional: If I am allowed back on, I will be blocked for up to a week, then, well, you know the rest (in the ARBCOM tradition) if I:

a)harass users b)make mamy personal attacks after being warned c)am disruptive after being warned, or d)attack Ryulong (no warning needed)

Is this something we can agree on?

Ionas

I'm afraid that, having discussed your case, the Committee has declined to unban you.

James F. (talk) 16:16, 26 January 2008 (UTC)