User talk:68.33.32.52

September 2020
Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Guangzhou. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Mentioning movements that can barely pack a Guangzhou Zhujiang New Town APM tram car in the WP:LEDE is a violation of WP:UNDUE Caradhras Aiguo ( leave language ) 03:00, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

1 September 2020
No such page titled "Guangzhou Zhujiang New Town APM Tram Car" is found on Wikipedia by the time this comment is published. However, there is a Wikipedia introduction about "Zhujiang New Town Automated People Mover System," and no "movement" is mentioned on the page. It could be a result of a wrongly codified or identified IP address.

That said, potential mentions of a "movement" should not be deemed as a violation of Neutral Point of View policy. Rather, it is encouraged by Wikipedia. Please see below a quote from Wikipedia's guidelines on lead writing style:

"It should identify the topic, establish context, explain why the topic is notable, and summarize the most important points, including any PROMINENT CONTROVERSIES." — Preceding unsigned comment added by Trunks Londonson (talk • contribs) 20:45, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
 * That was a metaphor, and the point is the movement is so small the number of its adherents could barely fill a Zhujiang New Town APM tram car. The other problem with this sham "contribution" is 1) the fact WP:LEDE is as quoted as follows: The lead serves as an introduction to the article and a summary of its most important contents. Even if a mention of the WP:FRINGE movement within the article body is warranted, by no measure does it constitute the "most important contents" (traits) of Guangzhou. 2) as far as I can tell, the journal makes no mention of any sovereignty movement, so this is a violation of this site's policy on verifiability. Caradhras Aiguo ( leave language ) 22:56, 1 September 2020 (UTC)