User talk:68.37.53.31

March 2016
Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that you recently removed some content from List of Donald Trump presidential campaign endorsements, 2016 with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   13:03, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

I added the section soon after Cruz and Kasich suspended their campaigns. Primary and post-primary endorsements were being cobbled together in un-sorted order. Now that the two sections have been worked out by other contributors, I removed my explanation. You may remove the now redundant explanation if you wish. ~ Joseph Frontroyal

Mattis
I removed the information you added at James Mattis because the sources have no real validity. In the game of politics there are a lot of writers that right speculative stuff to fill up inches in a magazine or get clicks. It therefore has no validity and doesn't belong at Wikipedia. Encyclopedia are backward-looking reference works. Chris Troutman ( talk ) 15:04, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

Presidential speculation seems valid enough to include in a retired Marine's page. The same could be said of Mitt Rommeny. ~Joseph Frontroyal

June 2016
Hello, I'm Fitindia. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to List of Donald Trump presidential campaign endorsements, 2016— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. FITINDIA&#160;(talk) 20:43, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

I was the one who added the section in the rather confusing time in the immediate aftermath of the Indiana primary. I added the explanation to help users add their contributions to either primary or post-primary sections. Now that both sections are well-established, I removed the now-redundant explanation. ~ Joseph Frontroyal