User talk:68.45.47.213

July 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Ken Griffey Jr. has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Scarian Call me Pat!  15:42, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

January 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Clint Howard has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you.  Running On  Brains  00:49, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

March 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to TheAmazingAtheist has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Alansohn (talk) 16:57, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. —Largo Plazo (talk) 18:51, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Deal W. Hudson
If you want to discuss an issue, please don't emblazon it across the top of the article's page. Please, instead, open a discussion on the article's talk page. The scandal history is in the article. Please read it carefully. The details can be found in the sources cited. Follow each footnote down to the bottom of the page and you'll see footnotes with details to back up the language of the article.

Here's the text:

"Hudson served as director of Catholic outreach for George W. Bush's 2000 and 2004 presidential campaigns. In 2004, Hudson resigned from the campaign, and shortly thereafter from Crisis,[9] when accusations of misconduct during his tenure at Fordham came to light. Hudson wrote an essay at the time, published at National Review Online, acknowledging and explaining the situation, saying

In matters of this nature, exaggeration, half-truths, and rumor often tend to overtake the truth — and I wanted truth to get a head start. [10]

The New York Times and Washington Post reported on the matter, as well.[8][11]

In 2008, Hudson was a prominent Catholic supporter of John McCain's presidential campaign. Efforts by his critics to have him removed from this campaign were unsuccessful.[12] Catholic League president Bill Donohue described the efforts as "vindictive campaigns of personal destruction under the guise of promoting the Catholic cause."[13]"

The numbers correspond to footnotes below. The footnotes are links to more information of the sort you seek. David in DC (talk) 20:08, 16 April 2009 (UTC)