User talk:68.47.65.239

Welcome!
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions&#32;so far. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

Here are some links to pages you may find useful:
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but if you wish to acquire additional privileges, you can simply create an account. It's free, requires no personal information, and lets you:
 * Create new pages and rename pages
 * Edit semi-protected pages
 * Upload images
 * Have your own watchlist, which shows when articles you are interested in have changed

If you edit without an account, your IP address (68.47.65.239) is used to identify you instead.

We hope that you choose to become a Wikipedian and  [ create an account] . If you need help, check out Questions, or you can  to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. We also have an intuitive guide on editing if you're interested. By the way, please make sure to sign and date your talk page comments with four tildes (&#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;).

Happy editing! Dcirovic (talk) 15:28, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

July 2016
Hello, I'm Music1201. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Marriage in the Isle of Man have been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. &mdash; Music1201  talk  23:02, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2017
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Episcopal Conference, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Operator873 CONNECT 20:19, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Eagle Scout
I added the new information about girls earning Eagle Scout to the History section. Rockypedia (talk) 18:47, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

May 2018
Your recent editing history at Nostradamus shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Ian.thomson (talk) 22:52, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
 * One issue I raised is the need for secondary sources. New Tang Dynasty Television, Epoch Times, and minghui.org are all Falun Gong outlets, and so WP:PRIMARY sources.  With the secondary academic source that was needed to begin with, those additional references aren't needed.  Even with the secondary source, though, there was still the issue of phrasing, which I've fixed.  Your phrasing made it sound like anyone outside of Falun Gong believed that Nostradamus was talking about Falun Gong. Ian.thomson (talk) 22:52, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

Note
--Neil N  talk to me 20:21, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

July 2018
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Title IX, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. TJH2018 talk  16:19, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   22:03, 5 July 2018 (UTC)

August 2018
 Hello, I'm Donner60. I noticed that in this edit to Higher education in the United States, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Donner60 (talk) 01:57, 11 August 2018 (UTC)


 * Thanks for fixing the edits. I thought I was restoring the version which you restored thereafter. In fact, you had made more edits previously so my revert was a mistake. Sorry for the error. So I am striking the above message. Donner60 (talk) 02:11, 11 August 2018 (UTC)

Hello, I'm LakesideMiners. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Eros and Civilization— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk or my talk page. Thank you. Lakeside Out!-LakesideMinersClick Here To Talk To Me! 16:59, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

Your message
Hi there! I'm just letting you know that I responded to the message you left on my user talk page. You can read it by clicking |here. Best regards -  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   01:31, 9 November 2018 (UTC)