User talk:68.49.78.77

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wally's Wonderland (September 17)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Liance was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Wally's Wonderland and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Wally's Wonderland, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Wally%27s_Wonderland Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Liance&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Wally%27s_Wonderland reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-Liancetalk/contribs 19:06, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

October 2021
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Willy's Wonderland, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. – wallyfromdilbert (talk) 21:13, 3 October 2021 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Willy's Wonderland, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. – wallyfromdilbert (talk) 23:00, 3 October 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Willy's Wonderland, you may be blocked from editing. – wallyfromdilbert (talk) 02:33, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Willy's Wonderland. – wallyfromdilbert (talk) 23:45, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

January 2022
Hello, I'm Anaxial. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Indian elephant, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Anaxial (talk) 07:25, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

February 2022
This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Talk:Hippopotamus, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. --Mr Fink (talk) 01:27, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Wally's Wonderland
Hello, 68.49.78.77. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Wally's Wonderland, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:01, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

February 2022
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Macaque. --Mr Fink (talk) 04:09, 21 February 2022 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Humpback whale, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. CycloneYoris talk! 23:11, 23 February 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at North American beaver. --Mr Fink (talk) 01:30, 24 February 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Wally's Wonderland


Hello, 68.49.78.77. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Wally's Wonderland".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 20:06, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

March 2022
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Dendrobates. --Mr Fink (talk) 20:16, 24 March 2022 (UTC)

 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Widr (talk) 20:26, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:20, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.
 * This is clearly a pattern of behavior. Fair warning that I operate on the three strikes rule. If I have to issue a third block for substantially the same behavior, it's going to be a long one. -Ad Orientem (talk) 23:22, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

May 2022
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. In your recent edit to Hairspray (2007 film), you added links to an article which did not add content or meaning, or repeated the same link several times throughout the article. Please see Wikipedia's guideline on links to avoid overlinking. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 19:31, 2 May 2022 (UTC)

June 2022
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. In your recent edit to The Bye Bye Man, you added links to an article which did not add content or meaning, or repeated the same link several times throughout the article. Please see Wikipedia's guideline on links to avoid overlinking. Thank you. CodeTalker (talk) 01:11, 25 June 2022 (UTC)

Hello, I'm STATZET. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to List of Ned's Declassified School Survival Guide characters have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. STATZET (talk) 19:57, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

STOP overlinking and START previewing your edits
Read MOS:OVERLINK before adding any more links to articles. You are making ridiculous links to words that are commonly understood. And LOOK AT where your links go. DON'T link to disambiguation pages. Use the preview button to look at your links before you save them, and click each link to see where it goes. Wikipedia can't magically figure out where you want your links to go. You have been asked previously to stop this disruptive editing. Sundayclose (talk) 19:39, 10 July 2022 (UTC)

October 2022
Hello, I'm CodeTalker. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Minotaur, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. CodeTalker (talk) 01:33, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed your recent edit to The Shining (film) does not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits a summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting, and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! DonIago (talk) 20:38, 14 October 2022 (UTC)

November 2022
Hello. I wanted to let you know that your recent edit(s) to Dungeons & Dragons (TV series) have been removed because you cited the information you added to IMDb. As discussed at WP:RS/IMDb, IMDb is considered a questionable source, and generally should not be used as a sole reference. You are welcome to re-add the information using a different reliable source, or with an additional source confirming the information from IMDb. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 20:35, 14 November 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Dungeons & Dragons (TV series), you may be blocked from editing. Additionally, do not add disambiguation links. DonIago (talk) 20:20, 15 November 2022 (UTC)

December 2022
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Dungeons & Dragons (TV series). As noted previously, IMDb is not generally considered a reliable source per WP:RS/IMDb. DonIago (talk) 20:38, 2 December 2022 (UTC)