User talk:68.79.7.37

Hey there, we have noticed that you keep blanking out any negative referneces to the IPT in direct violation of the wikipedia agreements. You appear to be using the wikipedia as an advertizing forum for the IPT.

Your latest actions in blanking out a revert have been tracked and are being reporeted to the team at wiki. Your actions amount to vandalism under the use agreement. Please stop before you get locked out of the page. IN RESPONSE TO ABOVE

1. Hey there; Who is we?

2. Information found at the following site http://internationalpooltour.com/ipt_content/event_schedule/default.asp

3. Information is verifiable

4. The Definition Of Vandalism that meets policy is as follows;

Vandalism is any addition, deletion, or change of content made in a deliberate attempt to compromise the integrity of Wikipedia. The most common type of vandalism is the replacement of existing text with obscenities, page blanking, or the insertion of bad jokes or other nonsense. Fortunately, this kind of vandalism is usually easy to spot.

Any good-faith effort to improve the encyclopedia, even if misguided or ill-considered, is not vandalism. Apparent bad-faith edits that do not make their bad-faith nature inarguably explicit are not considered vandalism at Wikipedia. For example, adding a personal opinion once is not vandalism — it's just not helpful, and should be removed or restated.

Committing vandalism is a violation of Wikipedia policy; it needs to be spotted, and then dealt with — if you cannot deal with it yourself, you can seek help from others.

Not all vandalism is obvious, nor are all massive or controversial changes vandalism; careful attention needs to be given to whether the new data or information is right, or false but well-intentioned, or outright vandalism.