User talk:68.83.224.192

May 2018
Hello, I'm Shellwood. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Isaiah— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Shellwood (talk) 18:10, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2019
Hello, I'm Crystallizedcarbon. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Gymnastics— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 18:54, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

February 2019
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Rita of Cascia. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Shellwood (talk) 17:17, 7 February 2019 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Hilary of Poitiers, you may be blocked from editing. Happy days, LindsayHello 17:36, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Hilary of Poitiers. Happy days, LindsayHello 17:38, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

March 2019
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Ellis Island, you may be blocked from editing.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   15:24, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Ides of March, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Shellwood (talk) 17:50, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. -- Ed (Edgar181) 17:53, 12 March 2019 (UTC)

October 2019
Hello, I'm Gilliam. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Agriculture in Australia have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. – Gilliam (talk) 16:42, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm Samf4u. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Operation Red Dawn—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Samf4u (talk) 13:13, 29 October 2019 (UTC)

September 2020
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Lunar north pole. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.  Heart  (talk) 14:05, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2020
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Lunar north pole, you may be blocked from editing. Johand 199 (Talk • Contribs)  14:23, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Lunar north pole. Johand 199 (Talk • Contribs)  14:26, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

October 2021
Hello, I'm Dhtwiki. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Cullinan Diamond have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Dhtwiki (talk) 00:36, 9 October 2021 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Widr. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Saint symbolism—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Widr (talk) 12:55, 29 October 2021 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Saint symbolism. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges.   Lakwat (talk) 12:56, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.