User talk:69.112.186.196

Welcome!
Hello! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. You are welcome to edit anonymously; however, creating an account is free and has several benefits (for example, the ability to create pages, upload media and edit without one's IP address being visible to the public).

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Tarheel95 (Talk) 21:16, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

August 2020
Hello, I'm AussieWikiDan. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Daffy Duck, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.

AussieWikiDan (talk) 18:09, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Dynomutt, Dog Wonder, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. credits Geraldo Perez (talk) 13:39, 10 August 2020 (UTC)

September 2020
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Derek Drymon, you may be blocked from editing. AviationFreak 💬 19:20, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Squiddly Diddly. Materialscientist (talk) 12:38, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

October 2020
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Peter Potamus, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Aoi (青い) (talk) 22:16, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2020
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Jellystone!, you may be blocked from editing. Aoi (青い) (talk) 20:47, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Trolls World Tour; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 00:28, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 00:10, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at The Ruff and Reddy Show, you may be blocked from editing. Same type of edits that led to prior block. Aoi (青い) (talk) 23:10, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2021
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Trivialist (talk) 22:45, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

February 2021
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Jellystone!, you may be blocked from editing. Geraldo Perez (talk) 05:15, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

March 2021
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Scooby-Doo (film), you may be blocked from editing. resumed off block Geraldo Perez (talk) 04:34, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. HJ Mitchell &#124; Penny for your thoughts? 09:54, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

May 2021
Hello, I'm AeschyIus. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Fred Armisen—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. aeschyIus (talk) 20:46, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

June 2021
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Tom & Jerry (2021 film), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. – wallyfromdilbert (talk) 04:38, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

October 2021
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Clifford the Big Red Dog (film), you may be blocked from editing. Hayleez  (talk)  01:13, 15 October 2021 (UTC)

February 2022
Please refrain from making edits on Wikipedia pages such as those you made to Mel Blanc, without first discussing your changes on the article's talk page, Your edit(s) require discussion to establish consensus as this is considered a type of change that other editors should be allowed to comment on. Your edits do not appear to have been discussed and have been reverted. Thank you. - FlightTime  ( open channel ) 01:11, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

Please don't change the format of dates, as you did to Jean-Paul Belmondo. As a general rule, if an article has evolved using predominantly one format, the dates should be left in the format they were originally written in, unless there are reasons for changing it based on strong national ties to the topic. Please also note that Wikipedia does not use ordinal suffixes (e.g., st, nd, th), articles, or leading zeros on dates.

For more information about how dates should be written on Wikipedia, please see this page.

If you have any questions about this, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Enjoy your time on Wikipedia. Thank you. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 14:31, 22 February 2022 (UTC)