User talk:69.113.199.176

October 2016
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Fallon Fox. Per the Manual of Style, Wikipedia gives precedence to gender self-identification as reported by reliable sources. This includes the use of appropriate pronouns corresponding to the identity (e.g., trans women typically use she/her and trans men typically use he/him). Further, per this part of the Manual of Style, birth names should be included in the lead sentence only when the person was notable prior to coming out. Your edits were counter to the one or both of these aspects of the Manual of Style and have been reverted or removed. Repeated vandalism like this can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 04:59, 1 October 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is BOGUS. I in NO WAY misgendered anyone. I READ THE SOURCES and COMPLETED THE SENTENCE as cited. The study DOES NOT come to the conclusion being claimed in the article, the sentence, from the source as follows, is PRETTY IMPORTANT. Their INCREDIBLY SMALL Sample size DOES NOT prove that transgendered women have less bone mass BEFORE treatment, and it's BOGUS to use a wikipedia article about a fighter with a WELL DESERVED controversy as a SOAP BOX to make unsupported blanket claims. Period. OBJECTIVE:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23369987

Maybe if you had actually READ THE SOURCE you'd see how it's being misused. Oh well, whatever, waste of my time.