User talk:69.121.72.12

{{subst:Welcome||

September 2020
Hello. Your recent edit to Sighetu Marmației appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. POLITANVM talk 21:34, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Gateshead Talmudical College
Please do not add non-notable people to the list of notable alumni. People who don't have their own Wikipedia article, are most likely not notable. Please also notice that repeating an edit that was reverted, is something that is frowned upon. If you think your original edit was justified, the correct course of action would be to discuss it on the article's talkpage. Debresser (talk) 22:57, 21 September 2020 (UTC)


 * I am not quite sure who you think you are to revert my edit, which should be equally frowned upon, but I will give you the benefit of the doubt, and assume that you simply are too remote and removed from the Haredi world to know who Rav Smith is. I don't mean this disrespectfully, and I sincerely ask that you don't take this personally, but the argument made by you here that a Rosh Kollel with hundreds of alumni, whose periodical in Torah is read weekly from New York to Australia, is so ridiculous that it raises questions about how initiated you are particular, and how much you know about the alumni of Gateshead Yeshiva to deem a scholar of his stature as "non-notable" in general. I would respectfully ask that you at least familiarize yourself with the subject before you make seemingly arbitrary decisions about who is "notable" and who is not in a milieu and world you seem to know absolutely nothing about.


 * I am a hasidic rabbi. So it is indeed likely I am not familiar with rabbis from Gateshead. Nevertheless, I provided you with a workable rule of thumb, and this rabbi does not meet that criteria. Debresser (talk) 14:54, 23 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Sorry to insert my two cents here, but I noticed your recent vandalism and your audacious removal of important comments on your talkpage, so, in the interest of fairness and truth, I hope to clarify a significant point. You, Mr. Debresser, are certainly are not a "notable" hasidic rabbi; and your claim that your being a "hasidic rabbi" renders you knowledgeable about the "rabbis from Gateshead" -- even though the latter is not a hasidic institution, and certainly not knopwn to the myopic world of Habad -- raises even more questions about your editorial integrity. I studied in Gateshead when Rav Smith was there, so I will try to give you an analogy you process the absurdity of your highly subjective view: While the current rosh yeshiva was undoubtedly the equivalent of Michael Jordan, Rav Smith was unquestionably the equivalent of Kobe. The vast preponderance of "rabbis" on the page are no way near as esteemed as Rav Smith or his father, one of the preeminent student of Rav Moshe Schneider, so I just don't understand how you can continue to make the edits you insist upon. Your obstinance, frankly, is beyond the pale. Please stio vandalizing the page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.53.120.184 (talk) 15:12, 25 September 2020 (UTC)


 * I refer to my previous reply here. And please, if you can't discuss respectfully, please don't. I refer to you calling my edit "vandalism" (look up WP:VANDALISM, please), to calling Chabad "myopic", etc. Please leave your personal opinions personal, and on this community-based website discuss only the issue (see WP:NPA). Debresser (talk) 16:24, 26 September 2020 (UTC)