User talk:69.124.116.101

Welcome!
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions&#32;so far. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

Here are some links to pages you may find useful:
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but if you wish to acquire additional privileges, you can simply  [ create a named account] . It's free, requires no personal information, and lets you:
 * Create new pages and rename pages
 * Edit semi-protected pages
 * Upload images
 * Have your own watchlist, which shows when articles you are interested in have changed

If you edit without using a named account, your IP address (69.124.116.101) is used to identify you instead.

I hope that you, as a Wikipedian, decide to continue contributing to our project: an encyclopedia of human knowledge that anyone can edit. If you need help, check out Questions, or you can  to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. We also have an intuitive guide on editing if you're interested. By the way, please make sure to sign and date your talk page comments with four tildes (&#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;).

Happy editing! – Rhinopias (talk) 09:37, 23 November 2017 (UTC)

July 2018
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Squaw, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. ''Please read the sources before altering sourced content. If you have alternate sources to provide for a section that is thoroughly-sourced and stable, please suggest them on the talk page of the article.'' - CorbieV  ☊ ☼ 17:39, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2019
Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. I am glad to see that you are discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways based on reliable sources and the project policies and guidelines, not for general discussion about the topic or unrelated topics, or statements based on your thoughts or feelings. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you. –  Broccoli  &#38; Coffee (Oh hai) 01:52, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

What, specifically, are you referring to? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.124.116.101 (talk) 03:27, 6 February 2019 (UTC)

May 2019
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), such as at Talk:Hugh Walpole, please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either: This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
 * 1) Add four tildes  ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment, or
 * 2) With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button OOUI JS signature icon LTR.png located above the edit window.

Thank you. DuncanHill (talk) 00:01, 8 May 2019 (UTC)

August 2019
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use talk pages for inappropriate discussions, as you did at Talk:Apple cider vinegar. Sum mer PhD v2.0 03:17, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.


 * Now that we've verified that you are actually reading your talk page, you will need to discuss the issue because you just don't seem to be understanding.


 * 1) Article talk pages are for discussing improvements to their articles, not for you to discuss the topic or ask questions about the topic. If you are curious about the pH of various substances and it is not discussed in the article, feel free to research the issue, find a reliable source and add it to the article. Yes, virtually everything is acidic or alkaline. (Water is both.)


 * 2) If you are discussing a topic in an on-going discussion, please add your comment to the end of that topic. I you have a comment that is a new topic, or addresses an old topic, please start a new topic at the bottom of the page by clicking the "+" tab at the top of the talk page. It is neither appropriate nor productive to add a comment in the middle of a discussion from 6 years ago. Similarly, don't add new topics between the table of contents and the existing topics.


 * 3) Sign your talk page comments. At the end of your comment, type ~ and this will add your IP address (or user name) and the date and time of your comment.


 * 4) As you have repeatedly ignored similar attempts to discuss these issues, if you continue to use article talk pages for inappropriate discussion, you will be blocked from editing. This is your last chance to figure out what you are doing wrong before that happens. - Sum mer PhD v2.0 21:21, 25 August 2019 (UTC)

How can I communicate with you directly?

The previous direction was actually incomprehensible as presented, and full of code. I gathered that I had phrased something incorrectly, but not what was actually wrong. I may be able to make a valid suggestion or request for information that belongs in an article, even if I may not have that information myself. Isn't the talk page a place to request a change or addition to an article?

"Article talk pages are for discussing improvements to their articles," which is (clearly) what I was trying to do. How should I have expressed the point, to be in conformance?

"As you have repeatedly ignored similar attempts to discuss these issues," - I asked for reference (see above) which request went unanswered. I still don't know what page or particular comment the February 2019 communication was referring to.

"If you are curious about the pH of various substances and it is not discussed in the article, feel free to research the issue, find a reliable source and add it to the article. Yes, virtually everything is acidic or alkaline. (Water is both.)" Vinegar is used and useful BECAUSE it is an acid. This is alluded to in the article, and further the interesting pH of Cider Vinegar in particular. (We must have done 20 Elementary and High School Chemistry experiments involving Vinegar.) It's not the same thing as including the pH of... asparagus or mutton. Vinegar is essentially a solution of acetic acid.


 * You can communicate with other editors at any time through article talk pages and user talk pages. Article talk pages are for discussing improvements to their associated articles. User talk pages are for discussing issues with their editing.


 * It isn't a matter of phrasing anything incorrectly. It is simply that the vast majority of your edits are questions, comments and opinons about the article's topic, rather than attempting to improve the article. You are using Wikipedia as a forum. Wikipedia is not a forum. Wikipedia is a general encyclopedia. General readers are unlikely to be interested in the pH of champagne or your opinion on whether or not cumin is safe. If you have a reliable source discussing the pH of champagne and are wondering if it should be added to the article, that is discussion related to improving the article.


 * The February 4, 2019 note was likely related to your discussion about article topics here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, etc.


 * I do not doubt that you did stuff with vinegar in science class. I recall doing experiments with wooden wheels, chicken eggs and a bunch of other things. I doubt the associated articles include the coefficient of friction for wood, the end-to-end crushing strength of egg shells, etc. If they do, they should be citing reliable sources.


 * Long story short, you do not seem to be here to build an encyclopedia, which is what article talk pages are for. You seem to be here to use the encyclopedia (which is great) and use the editors to answer your questions about topics (which is not acceptable). - Sum mer PhD v2.0 17:25, 26 August 2019 (UTC)