User talk:69.125.137.23

February 2019
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to The Road to El Dorado, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:08, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2019
Hello, I'm Gooner2004. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Kung Fu Panda 2 have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. Gooner2004 (talk) 02:31, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2019
Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Jurassic World. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:34, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

August 2019
Hello, I'm 2601:640:8880:3304:79C0:86E7:DCBC:BA35. I noticed that you recently removed content from The King's Speech without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. 2601:640:8880:3304:79C0:86E7:DCBC:BA35 (talk) 01:26, 2 September 2019 (UTC)

September 2019
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows – Part 1, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 19:52, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2020
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Stuart Little 2. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Sum mer PhD v2.0 05:05, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Recent edit to Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse
Hello, and thank you for your recent contribution. I appreciate the effort you made for our project, but unfortunately I had to undo your edit because I believe the article was better before you made that change. Feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions. Thank you!  CatcherStorm    talk   22:07, 20 January 2020 (UTC)

NPOV
Instead of changing a Wikipedia article to say that something or someone was "a success", simply list whatever awards were won. The difference is puffery vs factual statements. This is important to maintain a neutral point of view (NPOV). NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 10:50, 17 February 2020 (UTC)

March 2020
Hello, I'm I dream of horses. I noticed that in this edit to The King's Speech, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. I dream of horses (talk) (contribs) Remember to &#123;&#123;ping&#125;&#125; me after replying off my talk page 21:56, 23 March 2020 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Dunkirk (2017 film), you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 04:58, 30 March 2020 (UTC)

April 2020
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Star Wars: Episode III – Revenge of the Sith, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. 4TheWynne  (talk  •  contribs)  00:52, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

"Box office bomb"
Hi there, re: this and this, I don't believe the WikiProject Film community typically likes for hyperbolic labels like "box office bomb" to be added to film articles as they might contravene our policy on neutral point of view. You should definitely ask them. Also note that you've submitted this content, and have been reverted twice. The first time you are reverted, you should open a discussion on the article's talk page to seek consensus for the version you prefer, as Wikipedia is a community project and discussion is part of our Bold, Revert, Discuss process. Resubmitted challenged content is considered edit-warring, which is considered disruptive. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 23:28, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

May 2020
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Planet of the Apes (2001 film), you may be blocked from editing. Sum mer PhD v2.0 01:51, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.