User talk:69.130.21.178

It is interesting to compare this article and the same article covering President Obama. Trump's article controversy over fluff. Obama's article Fluff over controversy.

From Obama's article. "Obama's presidency has generally been regarded favorably, and evaluations of his presidency among historians, political scientists, and the general public place him among the upper tier of American presidents" This is straight editor opinion, with no citation.

Trump's article is littered with these types of uncited statements, "Trump has made many false or misleading statements during his campaign and presidency." While most likely true, the same statement would apply to Obama and everyone else for that matter.

Wikipedia is supposed to be an unbiased source, yet one can readily detect the preference Wikipedia's editors have and their bias permeates everything written.