User talk:69.131.80.236

Welcome!
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, such as the one you made on Wawasan Nusantara. I greatly appreciate your constructive edits on Wikipedia. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * How to write a great article
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Simplified Manual of Style
 * Recent changes patrol

You are welcome to continue editing without logging in. If you like, you can  [ create an account] . Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits, such as the ability to create articles. For a full outline and explanation of the benefits that come with creating an account, please see this page. If you edit without a username, your IP address (69.131.80.236) is used to identify you instead.

In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Fizz_fam&action=edit&section=new my talk page], or ask your question and then place  before the question on this page.

Again, welcome! i am fizz (talk) 00:09, 3 April 2024 (UTC)

March 2024
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Mahé River, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. User3749 (talk) 06:19, 2 March 2024 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Aaron Liu. I noticed that you recently removed content from Nadapuram without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Aaron Liu (talk) 22:57, 4 March 2024 (UTC)

April 2024
Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Armour of God (film). There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you. Thanks, Neuropol  Talk  14:49, 5 April 2024 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Bennelong. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. ''On 6 April you have changed many articles, sometimes usefully but often contrary to MOS, especially MOS:LOGICAL. Kindly observe the house rules, of which you have been reminded repeatedly. Errantios (talk) 23:50, 6 April 2024 (UTC)'' Errantios (talk) 23:50, 6 April 2024 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to use disruptive, inappropriate or hard-to-read formatting, as you did at Sarah, Duchess of York, you may be blocked from editing. There is a Wikipedia Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. ''As explained to you before, punctuation goes outside quotation marks. See Logical quotation on Wikipedia.'' Celia Homeford (talk) 08:56, 12 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Well then, I see that I do not realize that grammar differs between the US and the UK. They thought what edit I did was disruptive, inappropriate or hard-to-read. Any reason why? I thought what was being written originally was a “grammar issue.” 69.131.80.236 (talk) 21:03, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Also, I know the Disney short was by the former DisneyToon studio, not the main feature department. Plus, the short was created as a bonus on the 2004 Mary Poppins DVD, which that movie is mostly live-action but with one significant scene involving the live characters over animated backgrounds (with animated gentlemen and penguins (among other animals), for that matter. 69.131.80.236 (talk) 21:06, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Oops, my bad. What I said in the previous reply about that short was true, but I think I should have not edited that section in the Sarah article since I just checked the reference citation (Zayed University). My regrets. 69.131.80.236 (talk) 22:39, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Please respond. It has been several minutes since I last replied. Not spam. 69.131.80.236 (talk) 22:25, 13 April 2024 (UTC)


 * As explained at Logical quotation on Wikipedia, logical punctuation is neither British nor American. These are misnomers. Celia Homeford (talk) 07:36, 15 April 2024 (UTC)

recent edits
good evening.

your recent edits specify grammar fixes, but they are not.

in your enthusiasm, you're making more mistakes than you're fixing.

slow down and check your work, for the win. thanks in advance, Augmented Seventh (talk) 05:53, 21 May 2024 (UTC)


 * You’re welcome. 69.131.80.236 (talk) 20:51, 21 May 2024 (UTC)

June 2024
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. False edit summaries - FlightTime  ( open channel ) 21:24, 21 June 2024 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Alka-Seltzer. ''

Unsourced date changes'' - FlightTime  ( open channel ) 23:55, 21 June 2024 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make unexplained changes to information on Wikipedia.

Please stop using the same canned edit-summary for every edit you make on wikipedia. Many of your changes do not seem to be constructive. Marincyclist (talk) 03:30, 22 June 2024 (UTC)

Do not mark your edits with inappropriate edit summaries. Your edits have been reverted or removed as unconstructive, and the use of deceptive or inappropriate edit summaries is considered disruptive editing; if you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Marincyclist (talk) 03:52, 22 June 2024 (UTC)

 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. – bradv  05:51, 22 June 2024 (UTC)


 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

July 2024
Hello, I'm CFA. I noticed that you recently removed content from La mer (Debussy) without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. C F A  💬  01:23, 8 July 2024 (UTC)


 * I removed the sentence because it was too vague and may have had weasel words. It also had no source. 69.131.80.236 (talk) 01:25, 8 July 2024 (UTC)