User talk:69.137.180.148

September 2022
Mr. Roseman (if you are indeed him),

Having started the article and developed it to what it is now, I do very much appreciate your interest in adding to the article and seeing that it is accurate. However, I did have to remove that one sentence that began "ironically" ... not only is there no source for it (and you (accidentally, I hoped) removed the footnote citing the New York Times article at that point), we very much prefer not to have the text of our articles make observations like "ironically ..." As I noted in my edit summary, that's better left as an exercise for the reader.

I am leaving the other changes in for now, since they are fairly innocuous, but ... while this IP address does resolve to the Tucson area we have no other proof beyond you saying so that you are Ron Roseman, and of course anyone could be representing themselves as you. So, I would have to revert the changes you made in a few days unless you're willing to get in touch with me through email (via my user page linked from the end of this comment; click on the link either in the column at the side on the left or the pinkish box up top right) or the Foundation office to provide additional means of verifying that you are who you say you are (And even without that, if there's any reliable sources (like other newspapers) that give those details you added that would be the best solution). Daniel Case (talk) 03:40, 19 September 2022 (UTC)