User talk:69.142.113.213

January 2022
I have no interest in going on a back and forth with an anonymous editor whose first and only edits are to a specific page, and who only engages with other editors in petty insults. To reiterate the policies used on this website, per WP:RS:
 * Analyses from self-published blogs and self-published documentaries promoted by a U.S. communist party are not reliable sources. There is nothing wrong with the statement that Park's claims have been denounced as exaggerations or contradictory, but "Many North Korean defectors accounts of North Korea, both good and bad" is weasley and the language likely stems from the sources being cited, which are deemed not reliable by Wikipedia.

I am going to assume good faith and assume that you think I or other editors are trying to make the article Yeonmi Park undue in its coverage. However, as I said, critiques that her accusations are exaggerated, contradictory or false is covered in detail in the section "Activism and critical reception". The problem is not only that the sourcing is bad, but also that: This will be my only response to this matter. If you continue to ignore these explanations as to why your edits were reverted, you may be blocked for disruptive editing. Centre Left Right ✉ 20:32, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
 * What was removed is already covered in the article, but better (i.e. better wording, tone, sources, attribution)
 * The paragraph being removed is written horribly ("North Korean defectors... both good and bad"? I would not describe anyone with words as vague as "good and bad". What does that mean specifically?)