User talk:69.165.137.52

February 2017
Hello, I'm Junior5a. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Tecumseh— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~ Junior5a   (Talk)   Cont  21:34, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

August 2022
Your accusation of 'vandalism' demonstrates your ignorance on the topic... the page erroneously attributes the first description of this structure to Thomas Bartholin, which, despite the meaninglessness of using eponyms, is patently wrong -- The glands were first described by his son, Caspar Bartholin the Younger. This fact is even stated and referenced below in the "History" section of this same article. It would serve Wikipedia well to expect that their editors to have some base knowledge or read up on the topics that they oversee before making mindless revisions. If that were the case, we may even see a move away from eponyms to describe these terms in the first place. The terminologia anatomica should be the primary nomenclature for article titles if Wikipedia is to retain any legitimacy as a resource. 69.165.137.52 (talk) 21:36, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

You are correct. Apologies. Zefr (talk) 21:53, 29 August 2022 (UTC)