User talk:69.181.101.30

November 2023
Hello, I'm Philipnelson99. I noticed that in this edit to Muhammad bin Jamil Zeno, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Philipnelson99 (talk) 22:57, 12 November 2023 (UTC)

December 2023
Hello, I'm Maylingoed. I noticed that in this edit to Sulayman ibn Abd al-Wahhab, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. mAyLiNgOeEd  (Talk to me!) (See what else I did on Wikipedia!!📜)  04:45, 24 December 2023 (UTC)


 * It is not befitting for the integrity of Wiki to be promoting oppositional propoganda. The brother of Muhammad ibn Abdul Wahhab name is also named ibn Abdul Wahhab it is a lie that he made a refutation on his brother or started using his own father’s name as an insult. Oppositional articles is not a proof. 69.181.101.30 (talk) 04:50, 24 December 2023 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Sulayman ibn Abd al-Wahhab, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you would like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. mAyLiNgOeEd  (Talk to me!) (See what else I did on Wikipedia!!📜)  04:53, 24 December 2023 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Sulayman ibn Abd al-Wahhab shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. —C.Fred (talk) 04:57, 24 December 2023 (UTC)