User talk:69.203.75.240

The original article is full of significant errors and bizarre statements. I edited two books on the subject and published all of the documents on microfiche, so i have posted a substitute article.
I fail to understand why whoever controls the page on the Indian Claims Commission prefers to maintain a horribly incorrect fantasy instead of utilizing the information I have provided, which completely refutes what appears on the page and is 100% based on facts. Like (I suppose) hundreds of millions of people i use Wikipedia to answer questions and i accept the information I find. But now that I see what a mess someone can make on Wikipedia, it raises questions in my mind about the rest of the articles. I am going to try to email the first 7 pages of my book on the ICC. Perhaps it will convince whoever is the arbiter to accept the information and to use it to correct the errors--unless someone who controls the page is married to false statements. Norman20c (talk) 15:03, 28 January 2021 (UTC)