User talk:69.249.244.47

May 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edits you made to List of programs broadcast by The Hub, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Digifan23 19:23, 18 May 2011 (UTC) User:Digifan23

June 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to The Problem Solverz has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Katieh5584 (talk) 12:20, 30 June 2011 (UTC)

August 2011
Your recent edit to the page Eric Bauza with this edit appears to have added incorrect information and has been reverted or removed. All information in this encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable, published source. If you believe the information that you added was correct, please cite the references or sources or before making the changes, discuss them on the article's talk page. Please use the sandbox for any tests that you wish to make. Do take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. ArglebargleIV (talk) 14:03, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

February 2012
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Bucky O'Hare and the Toad Wars, please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Digifan23 (talk) 21:08, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2012
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding or significantly changing content without citing a reliable source is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Jim1138 (talk) 05:40, 17 March 2012 (UTC)

April 2012
Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Elizabeth Daily. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Sum mer PhD (talk) 16:44, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Jim Cummings, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Doc  talk  04:56, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistently adding dubious unsourced content to articles, despite repeated warnings. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JamesBWatson (talk) 13:18, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

June 2012
If you add one more "TBA" credit for any actor or actress without any sort of reference, or make any other semi-questionable edit, I will have this IP blocked. Again. This is your only warning. Doc  talk  12:56, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing again, for continuing to add the same kind of dubious unsourced content to articles to articles, in exactly the same way as led to your previous block. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JamesBWatson (talk) 08:00, 18 June 2012 (UTC) (UTC)