User talk:69.31.101.247

August 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. The project's content policies require that all articles be written from a neutral point of view, and not introduce bias or give undue weight to viewpoints. Please bear this in mind when making edits such as your recent edit to Restoring Honor rally. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Kubigula (talk) 13:46, 30 August 2010 (UTC) Hello, yes I have taken the 'neutral point of view' ideal quite seriously, and would be willing to discuss how you believe I have not been neutral, in respect to what has already been written and which you consider neutral and I certainly do not. (For one small example, suggesting that calling Beck 'weepy' is not insulting makes no sense, since it is clearly meant as an insult. One would not call their friend who was crying from passion names, therefore the writer calling him 'weepy' does not like him and meant to insult him. Thus my changing the edit to clarify that the writer was insulting him rather than describing him was fair and contextually neutral.)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Restoring Honor rally. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Jusdafax  13:53, 30 August 2010 (UTC)

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Restoring Honor rally. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Jusdafax  13:55, 30 August 2010 (UTC)

This is your final warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, as you did with this edit to Restoring Honor rally. Mutinus (talk) 13:58, 30 August 2010 (UTC)

You have NO justification for blocking my free speech, on this ostensibly open and editable on-line Encyclopaedia. Or at least if you do I can not see it. Can you please explain yourself more clearly (without calling names or being insulting, please)


 * You misunderstand what free speech means. Take a look at WP:FREE. The quick summary is that while you have a right to free speech, and while the government cannot take that right from you, you have no "right to be published."  In exactly the same way that you can't walk into a newspaper and say "You have to publish this story I wrote, I have free speech," you cannot force a web host to publish your words either.  Since your words violate Wikipedia's policies on maintaining a neutral point of view, your comments are being reverted, and you have been reported for engaging in disruptive editing.  I recommend that you stop, read the two previous links, and re-think the way you are participating in this project.  Qwyrxian (talk) 14:06, 30 August 2010 (UTC)

I agree with you in appreciation of your newspaper analogy, and didn't realize that was the model wikipedia was based on. I am still unclear who is in charge of what is considered neutral or not. Clearly you and I disagree on what is neutral, since much of what is on that descriptive page of the rally seems obviously anything but. For example, in the 'media' section you've listed almost every popular left-wing outlet venting their disdain for Beck, yet you balk when I simply point out their obvious political affiliation. How is this not 'neutral' of me and fair of you?

Sockpuppetry case
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Sockpuppet investigations/69.31.101.247 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Millahnna (talk) 14:03, 30 August 2010 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for your disruption caused by your engagement in an edit war at Restoring Honor rally. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JohnCD (talk) 14:10, 30 August 2010 (UTC)