User talk:69.4.99.142

Speedy deletion of Image talk:Ford-I4DOHC-engblock.jpeg
A tag has been placed on Image talk:Ford-I4DOHC-engblock.jpeg, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. OsamaKReply? on my talk page, please 12:56, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

April 2010
Please do not add unsourced or original content. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. DanielRigal (talk) 11:50, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2010
This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did to Qubo, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Powergate92  Talk  20:43, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Mr Men
You must stop adding made up rubbish to the Mr Men articles. Nothing about Series 3, or its alleged characters, will be ever allowed into the articles unless it is referenced to a reliable source. --DanielRigal (talk) 20:09, 5 July 2010 (UTC)