User talk:69.5.131.1

January 2018
Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Reuben Singh— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Serols (talk) 16:11, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Reuben Singh. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 16:12, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Reuben Singh, you may be blocked from editing. Serols (talk) 16:19, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Reuben Singh. . Lakeside Out!-LakesideMinersClick Here To Talk To Me! 16:20, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

June 2018
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Dantas has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:40, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Dantas was changed by 69.5.131.1 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.976066 on 2018-06-24T00:40:35+00:00.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Dantas. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Aspening (talk) 00:42, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Dantas, you may be blocked from editing. Funplussmart (talk) 00:44, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Dantas. Funplussmart (talk) 00:46, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Dantas, you may be blocked from editing. Aspening (talk) 00:51, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent vandalism. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. – Muboshgu (talk) 01:01, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

September 2018
Hello, I'm Gilliam. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Han dynasty have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. – Gilliam (talk) 00:36, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2023
Hello! I'm Ifly6. Your recent edit(s) to the page Cato the Younger appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been reverted for now. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. The Cato referred to in the portion that you edited is Cato the Elder, who was consul in 195 BC and the novus homo; see MRR'' 1.339, Livy 33.43.5, Val. Max. 4.3.11, Plut. ''Cat. Maj.'' 10–11, etc. Cato the Younger (Uticensis) is a member of the nobiles and was the person who never held the consulship. Moreover, (1) nobody is elected to the senate and (2) a novus homo is definitionally a person who is from a family without a consular ancestor, which makes your edit internally contradictory. Cf Brunt (1982) 72 JRS 1 but see refutation at Burckhardt (1990) 39 Historia 77.'' Ifly6 (talk) 15:59, 22 March 2023 (UTC)