User talk:69.5.96.48

November 2017
Hello, I'm Gilliam. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Drift Creek (Siletz Bay) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. – Gilliam (talk) 21:34, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2019
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Salvador Dalí has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:06, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Salvador Dalí was changed by 69.5.96.48 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.925063 on 2019-01-14T18:06:01+00:00

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Salvador Dalí. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. – Gilliam (talk) 18:09, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Salvador Dalí. Dorsetonian (talk) 18:15, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Widr (talk) 18:38, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Georges Seurat, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Girth Summit  (blether) 18:28, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2019
Hello, I'm Gilliam. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. – Gilliam (talk) 18:03, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2022
Hello, I'm Hey man im josh. An edit that you recently made to Eucalyptus denticulata seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Hey man im josh (talk) 19:31, 20 April 2022 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Eucalyptus denticulata, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you would like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. PAVLOV (talk) 19:34, 20 April 2022 (UTC)